Dreamcatcher
Stephen
King
May 27, 2003
Let me say at the
outset: I am a HUGE Stephen King fan, and I've read all the novels and short
stories, as well as his rather wonderful books on writing.
Unfortunately, Dreamcatcher
is a bloated, vacuous, dreadful piece of self-indulgence that mostly goes to
show that King has apparently gotten so famous that no one dares edit him or
tell him that he's written a bad book.
Since I also love (or
have loved) the 'potboilers' of Grisham, Crichton, et al., I note an increasing
trend among these writers (case in point: Tom Clancy's tumid Sum of All
Fears): to write obese and flabby novels (high-cholesterol plot, no
unneeded fiber such as character development) that all but completely ignore
the reader and keep winking ingratiatingly at the screenwriter over your
shoulder. Personally, I'm a little sick of it.
Thankfully, you don’t
have to give up good writing in order to enjoy action-oriented, heavily plotted
suspense fiction—consider the truly wonderful series of carefully constructed
books by Lincoln Child and Douglas Preston or Dan Brown’s DaVinci Code.
Until King and the rest
of his “I-have-more-money-than-god-so-every-word-I-write-is-gold” ilk stop
acting like hacks and start crafting prose again, I say we boycott them
entirely and give our money and attention to writers who still give a crap
about whether we read them.